GUPTA MECHANICAL

IN THIS WEBSITE I CAN TELL ALL ABOUT TECH. TIPS AND TRICKS APP REVIEWS AND UNBOXINGS ALSO TECH. NEWS .............

Thursday, 13 October 2022

[Solution] Smaller Codeforces Solution | Solution Codeforces



F. Smaller
time limit per test
2 seconds
memory limit per test
256 megabytes
input
standard input
output
standard output

Alperen has two strings, s and t which are both initially equal to "a".

He will perform q operations of two types on the given strings:

  • 1kx — Append the string x exactly k times at the end of string s. In other words, s:=s+x++xk times.
  • 2kx — Append the string x exactly k times at the end of string t. In other words, t:=t+x++xk times.

After each operation, determine if it is possible to rearrange the characters of s and t such that s is lexicographically smaller than t.

Note that the strings change after performing each operation and don't go back to their initial states.

 Simply speaking, the lexicographical order is the order in which words are listed in a dictionary. A formal definition is as follows: string p is lexicographically smaller than string q if there exists a position i such that pi<qi, and for all j<ipj=qj. If no such i exists, then p is lexicographically smaller than q if the length of p is less than the length of q. For example, abdc<abe and abc<abcd, where we write p<q if p is lexicographically smaller than q.

Input

The first line of the input contains an integer t (1t104) — the number of test cases.

The first line of each test case contains an integer q (1q105) — the number of operations Alperen will perform.

Then q lines follow, each containing two positive integers d and k (1d21k105) and a non-empty string x consisting of lowercase English letters — the type of the operation, the number of times we will append string x and the string we need to append respectively.

It is guaranteed that the sum of q over all test cases doesn't exceed 105 and that the sum of lengths of all strings x in the input doesn't exceed 5105.

Output

For each operation, output "YES", if it is possible to arrange the elements in both strings in such a way that s is lexicographically smaller than t and "NO" otherwise.

Note

In the first test case, the strings are initially a= "a" and b= "a".

After the first operation the string b becomes "aaa". Since "a" is already lexicographically smaller than "aaa", the answer for this operation should be "YES".

After the second operation string a becomes "aaa", and since b is also equal to "aaa", we can't arrange a in any way such that it is lexicographically smaller than b, so the answer is "NO".

After the third operation string b becomes "aaaaaa" and a is already lexicographically smaller than it so the answer is "YES".

After the fourth operation a becomes "aaab" and there is no way to make it lexicographically smaller than "aaaaaa" so the answer is "NO".

After the fifth operation the string b becomes "aaaaaaabcaabcaabca", and we can rearrange the strings to: "baaa" and "caaaaaabcaabcaabaa" so that a is lexicographically smaller than b, so we should answer "YES".

No comments:

Post a Comment